How to Use a Teleconverter

When using telephoto and macro lenses, it is often desirable to get tighter framing on a subject that is being photographed. One of the main reasons is to magnify the subject and improve its detail in order to show it best to the viewer, but another reason could be related to improved framing and composition – by focusing tightly on the subject, it is often possible to remove the visual clutter surrounding the subject, which ultimately simplifies and enhances composition. Although photographers can often simply move closer to their subjects to get tighter framing, sometimes it is physically impossible to do that due to the nature of the subject (such as when photographing wildlife), or when action is taking place at a particular distance (such as when photographing sports activities). In such situations, a teleconverter can come into the rescue. While teleconverters can be incredibly useful, they also have a few rather serious disadvantages that can lead to increased blur and loss of sharpness. Let’s take a look at what a teleconverter is and go over its advantages and disadvantages in more detail.



First, we will define what a teleconverter is and how it can be used in photography.

What is a Teleconverter?

A teleconverter, also known as an “extender”, is a magnifying secondary lens that is typically attached between a camera body and an existing (primary) compatible lens. The purpose of a teleconverter (TC) is to increase the effective focal length of the primary lens, which unfortunately comes at the cost of decreased sharpness and reduced maximum aperture (due to loss of light). The magnification effect of a teleconverter and its effect on maximum aperture depends on its multiplication factor, which varies from 1.2x all the way to 3.0x (the most common ones are typically 1.4x and 2.0x). For example, if one uses a 300mm f/2.8 prime telephoto lens, a 2.0x teleconverter will double its focal length and decrease its maximum aperture by two full stops, which will make it a 600mm f/5.6 lens. Teleconverters also have the same effect on zoom lenses – the whole zoom range will get magnified and their maximum aperture decreased. For example, a 1.4x TC would make a 70-200mm f/2.8 into a 98-280mm f/4.0 lens.

Caspian Tern with a Fish
NIKON D700 + 300mm f/4D AF-S @ 420mm (1.4x TC), ISO 250, 1/2000, f/5.6

Optically, a teleconverter is typically comprised of multiple optical elements, the total number of which can vary depending on the optical design and focal length multiplication factor of the teleconverter. Typically, the larger the multiplication factor / the longer the teleconverter, the larger the physical size of the teleconverter. Since most teleconverters are designed to be used with a number of different lenses, their optical design normally incorporates standard lens elements without optical corrections, which unfortunately results in increased optical aberrations, such as lateral chromatic aberration. However, in some cases, manufacturers try to minimize the effect of optical aberrations by incorporating more complex lens elements, such as aspherical elements, into their teleconverter design.

Nikon TC-20E III Lens Construction
Complex 7 element 5 group design of the Nikon TC-20E III teleconverter that incorporates a single aspherical lens element

The use of extra-low dispersion lens elements is also rather limited in teleconverters, partly due to potential incompatibility issues with the primary lenses. There are exceptions to this too though – sometimes manufacturers make teleconverters specifically for one lens and in such cases they can incorporate any suitable optical lens elements as part of telephoto group of lenses. One such known case is the NIKKOR AF-S TC800-1.25E ED, which was not only made for the exotic Nikon 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR, but also each manufactured teleconverter was tuned to specifically work only with the 800mm lens it was shipped with. Because of this, the TC800-1.25E ED teleconverter cannot be purchased separately, like all other normal teleconverters.

Blue Heron in Flight
NIKON D700 + 300mm f/4D AF-S @ 420mm (1.4x TC), ISO 500, 1/2000, f/5.6

As a result, keep in mind that standard teleconverters designed to work with more than one lens are always going to be built with some compromises.

Common Teleconverters

Although practically every lens manufacturer involved in making super telephoto lenses also makes teleconverters, the most common ones you will find on the market are typically limited to 1.4x and 2.0x multiplication factors. Some manufacturers, however, also produce more uncommon teleconverters with other multiplication factors, but their use and effectiveness can vary greatly by lens. For example, Nikon and Hasselblad make 1.7x teleconverters, while accessory manufacturers like Kinko can make teleconverters with much larger 3.0x multiplication factor. Unfortunately, as explained below, teleconverters have rather drastic effects on lens performance both in terms of overall sharpness and autofocus speed, so one has to be very careful when choosing anything longer than 1.4x. In some cases, it might be better to crop an image in post-processing software to get closer to the subject, than to try to do the same with a teleconverter (this can be especially true when attempting to stack multiple teleconverters).

Black Skimmers
NIKON D700 + 300mm f/4D AF-S @ 420mm (1.4x TC), ISO 800, 1/2000, f/5.6

Teleconverter Lens Compatibility

As mentioned above, while teleconverters are typically made to work with more than one lens, there are no teleconverters on the market that work with every lens. Both Nikon and Canon have rather small lists of lenses (compared to the overall lens line) that are compatible with their teleconverters for a reason – most lenses are not designed to couple with teleconverters. Some have physical limitations, such as a rear element extending too close to the camera mount, while others have optical limitations. Since most teleconverters are specifically designed for professional super telephoto lenses, most wide angle, standard and telephoto lenses are not compatible with them. However, there are exceptions – some macro lenses, such as the Nikon 105mm f/2.8G VR do work quite well with Nikon teleconverters. In addition, it is important to point out that with very few exceptions, teleconverters made by one manufacturer are only designed to work with lenses from the same manufacturer, even if the camera mount is the same.

Black-necked Stilt
NIKON D3S + 300mm f/4D AF-S @ 420mm (1.4x TC), ISO 450, 1/1250, f/5.6

Below is the list of links to lens manufacturer websites, which detail teleconverter compatibility with specific lenses:

Always make sure to check that the teleconverter you are planning to use is compatible with the existing lens you are planning to use it on.

Red Fox Kit
NIKON D700 + 300mm f/4D AF-S @ 420mm (1.4x TC), ISO 800, 1/1250, f/6.3

Coupling Teleconverters with Prime vs Zoom Lenses

Generally, teleconverters work much better with super telephoto prime lenses than with zoom lenses. There are several reasons for that. First, aside from very few exceptions, zoom lenses are typically slower than prime lenses, which means that they already receive less light for the camera’s autofocus system to work with. As a result, there might be a great impact on both overall autofocus speed and its accuracy. In some cases, teleconverters can significantly reduce the maximum aperture of a lens, potentially completely disabling autofocus capabilities of the camera, as explained below. Second, it is very hard to optimize a zoom lens to perform evenly at all focal lengths, which makes sharpness uneven and inconsistent across the zoom range when a teleconverter is added. Third, with more lens elements moving in groups when zooming, lens decentering and other optical problems become even more apparent.

Nikon 70-200mm Wildlife Samples (1)
NIKON D700 + 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II @ 340mm (1.7x TC), ISO 800, 1/640, f/5.0

However, there are cases when teleconverters do work well with zoom lenses. For example, the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II is known to work well with the TC-14E II/III, very well with the TC-17E II and if one is willing to stop down to the f/8 range, even the TC-20E III can be quite a usable combination.

Sample #6
NIKON D3S + 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II @ 400mm (2.0x TC), ISO 800, 1/1250, f/10.0

The Pros and Cons of Using Teleconverters

The obvious advantage of using teleconverters is extended reach at a relatively low cost. This becomes especially true when utilizing high-quality prime lenses with a variety of teleconverters. For example, the Nikon 300mm f/2.8G VR II is a phenomenal lens that works well with all three modern Nikon teleconverters, TC-14E III (1.4x), TC-17E II (1.7x) and TC-20E III (2.0x). With these teleconverters, the 300mm f/2.8G can transform into 420mm f/4, 510mm f/4.8 and 600mm f/5.6 lenses, which makes it a very versatile option for sports and wildlife photography. The 1.4x and 1.7x teleconverters have little impact on autofocus performance and sharpness, because the lens was specifically optimized in its design to couple well with these teleconverters. The 2.0x teleconverter certainly does degrade AF performance and especially sharpness, but stopping down the lens by a full stop still makes it quite a usable setup. In essence, this allows the 300mm lens to cover three additional focal lengths from 420mm all the way to 600mm!

Pacific-slope Flycatcher
NIKON D700 + 300mm f/4D AF-S @ 420mm (1.4x TC), ISO 800, 1/1000, f/5.6

Another advantage of teleconverters is that they do not affect the minimum focus distance of a lens. Teleconverters do not affect optical characteristics of lenses – they only magnify the center portion of the frame. This means that if one were to use a telephoto lens with a short minimum focus distance, it could be used as an excellent option for extreme close-up / macro photography as well. For example, the Nikon 300mm f/4E PF ED has an impressive minimum focus distance of 1.4 meters. The 1.7x teleconverter would extend its reach significantly all the way to 510mm. At such close focusing distance, the lens will have its reproduction ratio increased by the same multiplication factor of the teleconverter lens, so it will go from 0.24x to 0.41x with the 1.7x teleconverter. A nice option for occasional macro work for sure! Similarly, when macro lenses are coupled with teleconverters, their reproduction ratio gets increased as well, allowing for even closer than 1:1 magnification. However, if one desires to decrease the minimum focus distance of a lens, it is only possible to achieve that with the help of extensions tubes, close-up lenses and lens reversal tricks.

Partial Lunar Eclipse
NIKON D810 + 300mm f/4E FL VR @ 600mm (2.0x TC), ISO 100, 1/100, f/11.0

Teleconverters also have their disadvantages. Aside from lens compatibility and cross-brand compatibility issues, teleconverters decrease the overall sharpness of the primary lens, magnify its lens aberrations, and reduce autofocus speed and accuracy. This is especially true for 2.0x and longer teleconverters. Let’s take a look at the impact of teleconverters on lens sharpness, based on our previously published research.

The Impact of Teleconverters on Lens Sharpness and Contrast

As I have already pointed out in my article on image degradation with Nikon teleconverters, teleconverters have a pretty drastic impact on the overall sharpness of the resulting combination. In the case of the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II lens, I was able to see teleconverter affect sharpness by as much as 26%, as seen below:

  • Nikon TC-14E II (1.4x) – 5% Sharpness Loss
  • Nikon TC-17E II (1.7x) – 17% Sharpness Loss
  • Nikon TC-20E III (2.0x) – 26% Sharpness Loss

And this is on a fast lens that is designed to work well with teleconverters. If I were to use the same teleconverters on slower, inferior or older lenses, the impact of the 2.0x teleconverter in particular would have been even more devastating. For example, the same 300mm f/4E PF VR lens mentioned above does not do well in terms of sharpness with the TC-20E III (2.0x) teleconverter. It sharpness is affected way beyond the 26% mark, based on my prior research. So one could not state that teleconverters affect all lenses the same way – some will couple better than others. What makes it even tougher to assess performance, is that sample variances in both teleconverters and lenses can work hand-in-hand or against each other, especially for 1.7x and longer teleconverters. That’s why some photographers might swear by a combination of one particular teleconverter and lens that works for them, while others might find results unacceptable when using the same exact setup.

Nikon 300mm f4E FL VR Sample Images (8)
NIKON D750 + 300mm f/4E FL VR @ 600mm (2.0x TC), ISO 3600, 1/1250, f/9.0

In addition to loss of sharpness, the overall contrast of the lens is also reduced, which is especially noticeable when using 2.0x teleconverters.

The Impact of Teleconverters on Autofocus Performance

As I have already explained above, teleconverters can have a drastic effect on both autofocus speed and accuracy of the primary lens and the camera, since the camera’s autofocus system has less light to work with. When using a teleconverter longer than 1.4x, quite a bit of light is lost when it is passed through the teleconverter, which can confuse the camera’s autofocus system, particularly in low-light situations. For this reason, I generally recommend against using 1.7x and 2.0x teleconverters on slower lenses, as such combinations can result in a very frustrating experience when shooting in the field.

Here is a quick summary of teleconverters and their impact on AF speed and accuracy:

  • 1.4x Teleconverters: Minimum impact on AF speed and accuracy on most lenses.
  • 1.7x Teleconverters: Impact on AF speed and accuracy depends on the primary lens. Generally, slower f/4 lenses don’t couple well with 1.7x teleconverters.
  • 2.0x Teleconverters: Generally, severe impact on AF speed and accuracy on most lenses. Only select f/2.0 and f/2.8 prime lenses work well with 2.0x teleconverters, and typically only in bright light conditions.
  • 3.0x Teleconverters and coupling of several teleconverters: AF functions are disabled – only used with manual focus.
Captured with Nikon 70-200mm VR
NIKON D300 + 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II @ 280mm (1.4x TC), ISO 800, 1/250, f/6.3

Teleconverters vs Extension Tubes

Extension tubes should not be confused with teleconverters, because their use and purpose are completely different. While teleconverters are always comprised of optical lens elements for the purpose of increasing focal length, extension tubes are physical attachments without any optics, the sole purpose of which is to reduce minimum focus distance for increased magnification. Because of this, extension tubes are used for macro work, whereas teleconverters are used to get closer to action.

AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f2.8G ED VR II samples (1)
NIKON D3S + 300mm f/2.8G VR II @ 500mm (1.7x TC), ISO 1600, 1/800, f/8.0

Teleconverter vs Cropping in Post

In some cases when using slow zoom lenses with a teleconverter, or when coupling several teleconverters together, image degradation can be so severe, that one might be better off cropping images in post-processing. In cases where autofocus functions are severely impacted and limited by a teleconverter, it is sometimes better to use a shorter teleconverter or drop the use of a teleconverter completely. What is better – a magnified out of focus subject, or a sharp subject with less resolution? That’s something you will have to assess and evaluate when using teleconverters, on a case-by-case basis.

Personally, aside from a couple of specific combinations, I personally avoid using 2.0x teleconverters. I regularly use 1.4x and sometimes 1.7x teleconverters, but I find 2.0x to be too much of a compromise on most lenses out there due to the above-mentioned AF issues and severe loss of sharpness / contrast. Sharpness and contrast can be improved in post, but focus problems cannot. However, there are always exceptions to keep in mind. Some lenses work acceptably well with 2.0x teleconverters and their use and practically could even improve in the future, thanks to newer technologies. One example of this is the Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM OSS, which works surprisingly well with 2.0x Sony teleconverter, even at the longest end of the zoom range.

2017 Total Solar Eclipse
Solar Eclipse
ILCE-9 + FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS + 2X Teleconverter @ 794mm, ISO 100, 1/60, f/13.0

Teleconverter vs Cropping in Camera

With many modern cameras offering shooting in crop modes (for example, most Nikon FX / full-frame cameras allow shooting in 1.5x DX crop mode), one might wonder if it makes sense to use a crop mode instead of a teleconverter to get closer to action. As we have numerously said in a number of articles at Photography Life, in-camera cropping is in no way different than cropping in post-processing, so it does not offer any additional benefits, aside from perhaps slightly increased frame rates and smaller files. If the latter two are not a concern for you, switching to a camera crop mode rarely makes sense, as you can crop images easily in post later. In fact, if a subject gets too close to the camera during shooting, you might miss your shots completely because of this in-camera cropping!

Hence, in-camera cropping will never have the same effect as the use of a teleconverter. Teleconverters effectively increase focal length, whereas cropping simply reduces the field of view.

Dolphin - 1/1600 Shutter Speed

Read more: https://photographylife.com/what-is-a-teleconverter

Category: Lenses | Views: 396 | Added by: lucy | Rating: 0.0/0
Total comments: 0